Curatorial - MAPBM Fabrik at Penrith Regional Gallery - Home of the Lewers’ Bequest, Emu Plains Australia.
2020 to 2021
Curatorial texts 1of 3
The Making: Let us consider two seemingly opposing models. One in which low cost textiles and clothing are disposable, where consumer consumption relies on clothing, in constantly changing colours and styles being cheaply and quickly produced, sold, disposed of and replaced. A large proportion of this making of clothing is to standard, westernised designs and the environmental costs such as water use and pollution, land degradation and the costs of disposal are not to be borne by the purchaser but by the whole community.
The other model is the slow fashion consumption model, higher quality, long life cycle, often handmade, where the textiles and clothing, the maker and the means of production are valued. It is here that the body of the weaver, spinner, dyer, and sewer, often ignored in the first model, is seen to occupy a specific space during the process of making either by hand or in a factory. The upfront costs of the slow fashion model are higher, tend to be borne directly by the purchaser and can be a barrier to many. However, with the expectation of a longer life cycle the end of life costs are significantly lower.
The mantra of the environmental movement is to reduce (to make less), reuse (to share the use) and recycle. It has been expanded by the push to upcycle, the hack or the remake. These processes increase the effective lifespan of the textile and clothing material. The process of recycling extends the life of the material by making it into a new product or use.
See Also: Global Fashion Agenda, fabrication, creative reuse, Cradle to Cradle, linear economy,
Curatorial texts 2 of 3
The Precarity of Labour: This is a term used to describe conditions of employment that are uncertain, often unsafe and fundamentally disrespectful of the worker and their place within a family and within a society. To be blunt, the worker is seen as totally replaceable.
“Precarious” can be used to describe a wide range of workers including the self-employed, those employed in large factories or retail organisations, and at the extreme end of the continuum, indentured workers. It is a term associated with low wages or low payment per task, uncertain or unreliable income streams, little or no control about the number of hours worked, doing “low-skill” work or, more realistically, having an easily replaceable skill. It is often associated with poor and unsafe conditions and representation. Many of the workers in the clothing, textile, and retail industries live precarious working lives.
Some argue this precarity affords a level of flexibility to the worker not possible under a regularised fixed hour, long term working arrangement and can provide an alternative route to permanent employment. However, the flexibility is rarely controlled by the worker unless the overall level of unemployment is low, or the worker has a specific highly sought-after skill. The common experience is that once a worker declines a shift, a contract, a gig they will not be offered anything again by that employer. They will be replaced.
See also: Selling door to door, hawkers, pedlars, online shopping, sharecropping, job losses, piecework, ‘bull’ system, casualisation, insecure jobs, unprotected work, on call, gig economy, child labour, slavery, waste picker and scavenger, indentured labour.
Curatorial texts 3 of 3
The Unmaking: The purposeful unmaking of textiles and clothing is not a priority in Australia. There is no official policy, procedure, or facility for large scale recycling of textile waste and currently half a million tonnes of unwanted textile and clothing products end up in landfill every year.
It is estimated that only five to ten percent of the textiles and clothing donated to charity or op shops in Australia is finally sold in those shops. The same amount again is sold into the second-hand market overseas. The remainder of the donations (75 to 90%) are sent to landfill as unsuitable for sale.
In Australia the second hand or resale market outside of the op shops is thought to be relatively small, although overseas this market is growing quickly, and it is claimed that it will be the largest segment in ten years. However, others speculate that the reuse/resale market will eventually be overwhelmed by the quantity of cheap fast fashion goods and become unworkable or unviable due to sorting costs.
Clothing and textiles are also unmade in other ways before the end of their life. Microfibres shed by synthetic clothes during the laundry process are thought to account for 35% of the microplastics in the world’s oceans.
While the gold standard of the effective use of materials is a circular economy, it is difficult to see how this will work if the textile and clothing product is not biodegradable and/or without stewardship of the product by the manufacturer.
See Also: Australian Circular Textile Association, Upparell, upcycle, Upcycle That, methane, Plant Ark Recycling, Immaculate Vegan, Measuring Fashion, Good on You, River Blue